A court docket in Kenya has ordered former President Daniel arap Moi to pay 1.06bn shillings ($10.5m; £eight.2m) in compensation to a widow for illegally seizing her land.
Mr Moi transferred to himself 53 acres of land belonging to widow Susan Cheburet Chelugui, the choose dominated.
The land was illegally grabbed 36 years in the past however solely transferred to Mr Moi’s identify in 2007.
Ms Chelugui’s husband Noah Chelugui was a neighborhood chief throughout Mr Moi’s rule.
The previous president, who stays Kenya’s longest-serving chief, was accused by Ms Chelugui and her son David Chelugui of transferring their household land into his identify two years after Ms Chelugui’s husband handed away.
You may additionally be all for:
Mr Moi is then stated to have bought the land to Rai Plywood Restricted, a timber agency, the BBC’s Mercy Juma experiences from Nairobi.
Rai Plywood Restricted advised the choose that it had purchased the land from Moi in 2007 after thorough authorized checks.
Nonetheless, Mr Moi was unable to offer the court docket any proof of how he got here to own the land, our correspondent says.
Choose Anthony Ombwayo stated Mr Moi had behaved in a manner that was “unconstitutional, irregular, unprocedural” and “tainted”.
Mr Moi grew to become Kenya’s second president in 1978 and served till 2002.
He dominated the nation with an iron fist and was accused of human rights abuses.
Beneath worldwide strain, he allowed multi-party elections in 1992, which have been marred by widespread violence and allegations of rigging.
A test-case for Kenya’s many land grabs?
By Mercy Juma, BBC Africa, Nairobi
This ruling is massively important for Kenya.
There have been quite a few instances of land grabbing by high-ranking authorities officers and rich enterprise folks through the years however the victims typically have neither the desire nor the cash to combat again.
Corruption within the judiciary is one other enormous downside. When disputes are taken to court docket, they usually drag on for a few years.
Many hope that it will come to be seen as a take a look at case and that it’s going to ship a message to highly effective folks that they’ll now not merely seize land belonging to the much less well-off.